debating the climate debate
Beyond Copenhagen
(Public discourse-cum-discussion organized by People Development and d-sector.org)
Is the world heading towards a logjam on emission reduction targets? Are negotiations heading towards a geo-strategic arm-twisting? Are national interests being compromised on ‘shared but differentiated’ framework? Is the world heading towards yet another Kyoto II?
These and many more, public discourse on the compelling concerns on climate change have either remained amidst closed doors or between column inches. Between the two, the social space has been usurped by co-opted parties in the disguise of civil voices.
There is more to climate change as the issue oscillates between myth and reality, between negotiation and submission and between targets and technology. Has the geopolitics not undermined the science of climate change? Is the world heading towards a new climate order or will the poor be the victims of the new climate hegemony? Will population reduction become the new global agenda?
If these and other questions concern and baffle you, you are welcome to be part of the public discourse-cum-discussion on Oct 6, 2009 at the Constitution Club, Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110001. The discourse will start at 5 PM with a moderated panel steering a debate. The distinguished panelists are:
Prof. Pratap Bhanu Mehta*, President, Centre for Policy Research
Mr. Surya P. Sethi, former Principal Adviser (Energy) to the Planning Commission
Prof. Sudipto Mundle, Emeritus professor with the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy and former Director, ADB
Mr Anupam Mishra, renowned environmentalist with the Gandhi Peace Foundation
Mr Gopal Krishna**, researcher and coordinator of WaterWatch Alliance
Dr Sudhirendar Sharma, environmentalist and columnist, will lead and moderate the discussion
The discussion will be followed by dinner. Kindly confirm your participation to the undersigned to help us better arrange the logistics.
*confirmation awaited
**Being present in Bangkok, Mr Krishna will provide first-hand account of the progress on the inter-ministerial deliberations on climate change.
Friday 2 October 2009
Thursday 1 October 2009
TERI sits on decision regarding dubious award to NHPC
TERI sits on decision regarding dubious award to NHPC
The jury panel of The Energy Resources Institute (TERI) for the environment excellence award 2009 may have decided to withdraw the award given to NHPC Ltd on June 5, 2009 for environment excellence, we have learnt. A number of persons and organisations, including Senior Supreme Court lawyer Shri Prashant Bhushan (Ph: 09811164068) and South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People (SANDRP) had written a letter to the jury on August 17, 2009, arguing that NHPC did not deserve the award for its performance in the specific project (URI hydropower project in Jammu & Kashmir) that was mentioned in the award citation. Moreover, the NHPC also did not deserve an environmental excellence award considering the abysmal track record of the company on social & environmental issues.
The letter, objecting to the award to NHPC was written only after a detailed study of the NHPC performance in URI HEP and also the case study prepared by NHPC and TERI on this issue, as also other official documents, including a review of the assessment done by the Swedish International Development Agency, which provided funds for the projects. Let us know if you would like to get a copy of the letter we wrote to TERI jury. Concerned TERI persons are: Mr RK Narang: 91-11-24682100, 41504900 x:2455; Prateek Ghosh: x:2520; M: +91 9810259265. TERI weblink regarding the awards: http://www.teriin.org/awards/winner_excellance.htm; NHPC web-link on the award: http://www.nhpcindia.com/English/Scripts/PressRelease.aspx?VId=154, NHPC company secretary contact no: 0129-2278421
On the world environment day this year (i.e. June 5, 2009), in a well publicized event, the President of India conferred the TERI awards to various winners for environment excellence and corporate social responsibility. In presence of India’s Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, the Jury of the awards headed by former Chief Justice of India J S Verma and TERI Director General Dr R K Pachauri, NHPC received the first prize for category III (companies with annual turnover above Rs 1000 crores). The award was supposed to be given for the “NHPC’s case study entitled Post Construction Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study of 480 MW Uri Power Station in Jammu and Kashmir.”
Subsequent to our letter, we have learnt that the jury panel met and examined the response from TERI and from NHPC to the issues raised in the letter. It appears that the Jury panel may have decided to reconsider the decision to give the award to NHPC. Sources within TERI tell us that the jury also expressed unhappiness at the inappropriate way the NHPC had used the award in public domain. It may be recalled that in the advertisements leading to the NHPC’s issue of Initial Public Offer, the company had used this award to in misleading way to give the wrong impression that the company has been awarded for its overall excellence in environment protection.
Unfortunately there is no public statement from TERI on this issue so far. TERI has not yet (till Oct 1, 2009) responded to our letter (dated Aug 17, 2009) to them, except acknowledging (on Aug 21, 2009) receipt of the letter and promising detailed examination.
We see that not only NHPC has provided misleading picture to claim the award, but it is guilty of bringing disrepute to the jury panel and the award. Since the President of India conferred this award, NHPC is also guilty of dragging that high office and all those involved in the award ceremony into controversy. Similarly, TERI is also guilty of not doing adequate due diligence and misleading the jury panel. In fact the TERI case study of NHPC put up on its website shows how shoddy work TERI did even in understanding the timing, relevance and details of the various claims made by NHPC and TERI staff seems to have unquestionably accepted all the claims of NHPC. There is also the issue of conflict of interest, since TERI has received over Rs 1 crore of funding from NHPC in recent years. This conflict of interest is not relevant to the independent jury members, but it is certainly relevant in the context of the TERI persons sitting on Jury Panel and also the TERI persons doing due diligence. However, as we write this, TERI has not yet removed NHPC’s name from the list of award winners on its website, we hope TERI will do that soon.
Since the matter is of significant public interest, and the matter was raised by us a month and half ago, it is important the TERI make a clear public statement immediately on this issue, clarifying the status of the dubious Award given to NHPC.
The jury panel of The Energy Resources Institute (TERI) for the environment excellence award 2009 may have decided to withdraw the award given to NHPC Ltd on June 5, 2009 for environment excellence, we have learnt. A number of persons and organisations, including Senior Supreme Court lawyer Shri Prashant Bhushan (Ph: 09811164068) and South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People (SANDRP) had written a letter to the jury on August 17, 2009, arguing that NHPC did not deserve the award for its performance in the specific project (URI hydropower project in Jammu & Kashmir) that was mentioned in the award citation. Moreover, the NHPC also did not deserve an environmental excellence award considering the abysmal track record of the company on social & environmental issues.
The letter, objecting to the award to NHPC was written only after a detailed study of the NHPC performance in URI HEP and also the case study prepared by NHPC and TERI on this issue, as also other official documents, including a review of the assessment done by the Swedish International Development Agency, which provided funds for the projects. Let us know if you would like to get a copy of the letter we wrote to TERI jury. Concerned TERI persons are: Mr RK Narang: 91-11-24682100, 41504900 x:2455; Prateek Ghosh: x:2520; M: +91 9810259265. TERI weblink regarding the awards: http://www.teriin.org/awards/winner_excellance.htm; NHPC web-link on the award: http://www.nhpcindia.com/English/Scripts/PressRelease.aspx?VId=154, NHPC company secretary contact no: 0129-2278421
On the world environment day this year (i.e. June 5, 2009), in a well publicized event, the President of India conferred the TERI awards to various winners for environment excellence and corporate social responsibility. In presence of India’s Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, the Jury of the awards headed by former Chief Justice of India J S Verma and TERI Director General Dr R K Pachauri, NHPC received the first prize for category III (companies with annual turnover above Rs 1000 crores). The award was supposed to be given for the “NHPC’s case study entitled Post Construction Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study of 480 MW Uri Power Station in Jammu and Kashmir.”
Subsequent to our letter, we have learnt that the jury panel met and examined the response from TERI and from NHPC to the issues raised in the letter. It appears that the Jury panel may have decided to reconsider the decision to give the award to NHPC. Sources within TERI tell us that the jury also expressed unhappiness at the inappropriate way the NHPC had used the award in public domain. It may be recalled that in the advertisements leading to the NHPC’s issue of Initial Public Offer, the company had used this award to in misleading way to give the wrong impression that the company has been awarded for its overall excellence in environment protection.
Unfortunately there is no public statement from TERI on this issue so far. TERI has not yet (till Oct 1, 2009) responded to our letter (dated Aug 17, 2009) to them, except acknowledging (on Aug 21, 2009) receipt of the letter and promising detailed examination.
We see that not only NHPC has provided misleading picture to claim the award, but it is guilty of bringing disrepute to the jury panel and the award. Since the President of India conferred this award, NHPC is also guilty of dragging that high office and all those involved in the award ceremony into controversy. Similarly, TERI is also guilty of not doing adequate due diligence and misleading the jury panel. In fact the TERI case study of NHPC put up on its website shows how shoddy work TERI did even in understanding the timing, relevance and details of the various claims made by NHPC and TERI staff seems to have unquestionably accepted all the claims of NHPC. There is also the issue of conflict of interest, since TERI has received over Rs 1 crore of funding from NHPC in recent years. This conflict of interest is not relevant to the independent jury members, but it is certainly relevant in the context of the TERI persons sitting on Jury Panel and also the TERI persons doing due diligence. However, as we write this, TERI has not yet removed NHPC’s name from the list of award winners on its website, we hope TERI will do that soon.
Since the matter is of significant public interest, and the matter was raised by us a month and half ago, it is important the TERI make a clear public statement immediately on this issue, clarifying the status of the dubious Award given to NHPC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)